Recently, there has been pressure on the Government by certain human rights advocates to enact laws that allow a terminally ill person to end their life. There are very few assisted suicide states in the United States right now; however, their number may grow due to this pressure from advocates.
Oregon has allowed physician-assisted deaths since 1994. These rules came into effect in 1998. Since that time, more than three hundred terminally ill people have used this law to bring about their deaths.
There is also a concern about prejudices against the disabled arising from these laws. This is because do not resuscitate orders are more often used for a person who is hospitalized with a severe disability. A person with a lifelong disability may also suffer from burn out and feelings of depression from many years of prejudice and intolerance in society. These individuals are believed to be more likely to refuse treatment and therefore end their lives prematurely.
In December 2009, the Supreme Court of Montana ruled that there was nothing in the law of the state which prevented a patient from asking for physician-assisted suicide. This essentially paved the way for these procedures in Montana. The Montana courts have also ruled that there is a constitutional right to privacy and that patients should have the dignity to die as they choose.
Despite these arguments, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that a person does not have a constitutional right to assisted suicide. This has allowed states to pass various laws prohibiting such procedures. Helping someone to commit suicide is deemed a felony by most state laws.
There is also the issue of religious ethics. Many religions in principle do not support the idea of doctors using their skills and knowledge to bring an end to the life of a patient. For example, Buddhism urges people to refrain from deliberately killing another living being. Judeo-Christian beliefs also condemn suicide as an affront to the gift of life from the Creator.
In Montana, the Supreme Court ruled in 2009 that doctors can prescribe medication to help a terminally ill patient to end their life. However, the legislature there has not yet enacted a law to allow this. There have been two assisted suicide bills introduced to the legislature in 2011, but they were not successful in getting past the committees. One of these bills provided certain protections to physicians who assist in these acts, while the other banned it.
In addition, they also need to get proper counseling before they make this decision. A qualified therapist can talk them through various end of life issues. It is also important that the therapist assess the patient for signs of depression or other mental illnesses. If the patient is severely depressed, they should be dissuaded from pursuing the suicide procedure until they overcome the depression and can think clearly. They must show they fully understand the ramifications of dying and how this will affect their loved ones.
Oregon has allowed physician-assisted deaths since 1994. These rules came into effect in 1998. Since that time, more than three hundred terminally ill people have used this law to bring about their deaths.
There is also a concern about prejudices against the disabled arising from these laws. This is because do not resuscitate orders are more often used for a person who is hospitalized with a severe disability. A person with a lifelong disability may also suffer from burn out and feelings of depression from many years of prejudice and intolerance in society. These individuals are believed to be more likely to refuse treatment and therefore end their lives prematurely.
In December 2009, the Supreme Court of Montana ruled that there was nothing in the law of the state which prevented a patient from asking for physician-assisted suicide. This essentially paved the way for these procedures in Montana. The Montana courts have also ruled that there is a constitutional right to privacy and that patients should have the dignity to die as they choose.
Despite these arguments, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that a person does not have a constitutional right to assisted suicide. This has allowed states to pass various laws prohibiting such procedures. Helping someone to commit suicide is deemed a felony by most state laws.
There is also the issue of religious ethics. Many religions in principle do not support the idea of doctors using their skills and knowledge to bring an end to the life of a patient. For example, Buddhism urges people to refrain from deliberately killing another living being. Judeo-Christian beliefs also condemn suicide as an affront to the gift of life from the Creator.
In Montana, the Supreme Court ruled in 2009 that doctors can prescribe medication to help a terminally ill patient to end their life. However, the legislature there has not yet enacted a law to allow this. There have been two assisted suicide bills introduced to the legislature in 2011, but they were not successful in getting past the committees. One of these bills provided certain protections to physicians who assist in these acts, while the other banned it.
In addition, they also need to get proper counseling before they make this decision. A qualified therapist can talk them through various end of life issues. It is also important that the therapist assess the patient for signs of depression or other mental illnesses. If the patient is severely depressed, they should be dissuaded from pursuing the suicide procedure until they overcome the depression and can think clearly. They must show they fully understand the ramifications of dying and how this will affect their loved ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment