Many urban legends have stemmed out about the crying statue of mother Mary. A lot of people would say that it is the work of some sort of supernatural force while the Catholic church would call it a miracle on earth. Despite all of this though, it is very interesting to look into the overall story of the weeping statue mary to know whether this is fact or fiction.
Now, in order to know whether this is actually fact or possibly just fiction, it is important to examine the first document case. The first one was reported sometime in the fifties in Sicily. According to the report, there was a Holy Mother figure inside the Siracusa church that started crying one day.
As expected, many people believed that this was a miracle from God and captured the phenomenon on video. As expected, this sparked a lot of controversies and a lot of noise, especially among the followers of the church. While there were those who believed it was a sign from above, there were also others who believed it was some kind of hoax.
This was not the only isolated case though as there was another popular case that popped up in Brisbane in the year 2004. This one involved religious figures inside the Inala Vietnamese Catholic Centre. According to the case, the Holy Mother figure bled a red substance that looked like blood and scented oil. Aside from these two, there were many more cases that popped out.
As expected though, many people have been trying to find a logical explanation for this. One of which was made by Dr Luigi Garlaschelli from the University of Pavia. In order to find the logical cause, he tried making his own holy mother figure and tried to make it weep without any electronic gadget or external help.
He made his own structure out of a plaster material that had a glazing that could absorb water. While the glazing did absorb water, a small crack or a rip in the material could make the water come out. Now, he tried to scratch the eyes portion a bit and found out that the water absorbed by the plaster did come out from the eyes looking like the statue was crying.
As for the one in the Brisbane church, the Archbishop Bathersby already concluded that it was not a miracle made by the supernatural but rather, were man made. First, he concluded that the scented oil was a scented oil that could be bought in any store and applied by someone on said figure. He also concluded that the red substance was not blood. Finally, his team also discovered that there were small holes in the eyes in which liquids could be injected.
The Brisbane incident was already proven to not be a true incident. The same could not be the same for Garlaschelli though as the original figure is locked up the church and none can touch it. That said, Garlaschelli was never able to do any tests on it to see if his theory was real.
Now, in order to know whether this is actually fact or possibly just fiction, it is important to examine the first document case. The first one was reported sometime in the fifties in Sicily. According to the report, there was a Holy Mother figure inside the Siracusa church that started crying one day.
As expected, many people believed that this was a miracle from God and captured the phenomenon on video. As expected, this sparked a lot of controversies and a lot of noise, especially among the followers of the church. While there were those who believed it was a sign from above, there were also others who believed it was some kind of hoax.
This was not the only isolated case though as there was another popular case that popped up in Brisbane in the year 2004. This one involved religious figures inside the Inala Vietnamese Catholic Centre. According to the case, the Holy Mother figure bled a red substance that looked like blood and scented oil. Aside from these two, there were many more cases that popped out.
As expected though, many people have been trying to find a logical explanation for this. One of which was made by Dr Luigi Garlaschelli from the University of Pavia. In order to find the logical cause, he tried making his own holy mother figure and tried to make it weep without any electronic gadget or external help.
He made his own structure out of a plaster material that had a glazing that could absorb water. While the glazing did absorb water, a small crack or a rip in the material could make the water come out. Now, he tried to scratch the eyes portion a bit and found out that the water absorbed by the plaster did come out from the eyes looking like the statue was crying.
As for the one in the Brisbane church, the Archbishop Bathersby already concluded that it was not a miracle made by the supernatural but rather, were man made. First, he concluded that the scented oil was a scented oil that could be bought in any store and applied by someone on said figure. He also concluded that the red substance was not blood. Finally, his team also discovered that there were small holes in the eyes in which liquids could be injected.
The Brisbane incident was already proven to not be a true incident. The same could not be the same for Garlaschelli though as the original figure is locked up the church and none can touch it. That said, Garlaschelli was never able to do any tests on it to see if his theory was real.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about a Weeping Statue Mary, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.thesetonmiracles.org/other-weeping-events now.
No comments:
Post a Comment