Political accountability is a phrase that refers to the guidelines that politicians are expected to adhere to by their constituencies and other organizations. The latter typically have the power to apply sanctions to such individuals. With the increase of the level of accountability expected comes an increase in the price paid by public officials who make decisions that benefit their personal interests, rather than the broader public.
Whether or not accountability is enforced largely depends on the effectiveness of the sanctions applied by watchdog organizations or public officials' constituencies. This effectiveness can be enhanced through political competition, due to the fact that each candidate has a definite motive to expose any unethical activities in which his or her opponents participate. This frequently motivates numerous public officials to hold themselves accountable, in lieu of having another group or individual perform this task.
For thousands of years, measures to enforce accountability and combat corruption have been taken by organizations and individuals. Measures of this kind come in many forms, such as bills against bribery, which were in effect in certain parts of the world as far back as the 16th century. Often the result of power struggles among political groups and similar organizations, bills of this type frequently offered positive results. Once the latter were recognized, they became a highly popular method of regulating politicians.
Constituencies expressing their collective demands to politicians is also an avenue through which such individuals can be held accountable. Refusing to financially support the politician's campaign or vote for him or her are also measures that people take in an attempt to ensure the official acts appropriately.
Almost everyone would agree that all political parties should be held to specific standards, but statistics throughout the world show that implementing effective systems to accomplish this is often difficult. A frequently heard complaint of numerous individuals concerns the way public officials spend their campaign funds. For example, many voters withdraw their support from candidates who are caught channeling such money into private interests or offering bribes for political backing.
Transparency plays a major role in public official monitoring as well. There is a broad range of measures that can be used to ensure that such transparency is consistent. These include offering court records to the public, which should include the decisions made by any politician who ever worked as a judge. Making government sessions and their transcripts open to public view and registering lobbying activities are also effective measures.
Other methods have been deemed effective in discouraging corrupt behavior. Examples of these include an established code of ethics, regulations on lobbying, and disciplinary committees. Additionally, asset declaration laws and party financing laws are among the most frequently used regulatory techniques.
To be fully effective, however, any type of political accountability law needs an implementation body. As time goes on, it is likely that more bodies of this type will be organized in order to weed out corrupt politicians and public officials. Unfortunately, there will always be shady individuals who seek a place in government office, but the aforementioned safeguards will enhance the general public's ability to separate the genuine candidates from those who are self-serving, dishonest or corrupt.
Whether or not accountability is enforced largely depends on the effectiveness of the sanctions applied by watchdog organizations or public officials' constituencies. This effectiveness can be enhanced through political competition, due to the fact that each candidate has a definite motive to expose any unethical activities in which his or her opponents participate. This frequently motivates numerous public officials to hold themselves accountable, in lieu of having another group or individual perform this task.
For thousands of years, measures to enforce accountability and combat corruption have been taken by organizations and individuals. Measures of this kind come in many forms, such as bills against bribery, which were in effect in certain parts of the world as far back as the 16th century. Often the result of power struggles among political groups and similar organizations, bills of this type frequently offered positive results. Once the latter were recognized, they became a highly popular method of regulating politicians.
Constituencies expressing their collective demands to politicians is also an avenue through which such individuals can be held accountable. Refusing to financially support the politician's campaign or vote for him or her are also measures that people take in an attempt to ensure the official acts appropriately.
Almost everyone would agree that all political parties should be held to specific standards, but statistics throughout the world show that implementing effective systems to accomplish this is often difficult. A frequently heard complaint of numerous individuals concerns the way public officials spend their campaign funds. For example, many voters withdraw their support from candidates who are caught channeling such money into private interests or offering bribes for political backing.
Transparency plays a major role in public official monitoring as well. There is a broad range of measures that can be used to ensure that such transparency is consistent. These include offering court records to the public, which should include the decisions made by any politician who ever worked as a judge. Making government sessions and their transcripts open to public view and registering lobbying activities are also effective measures.
Other methods have been deemed effective in discouraging corrupt behavior. Examples of these include an established code of ethics, regulations on lobbying, and disciplinary committees. Additionally, asset declaration laws and party financing laws are among the most frequently used regulatory techniques.
To be fully effective, however, any type of political accountability law needs an implementation body. As time goes on, it is likely that more bodies of this type will be organized in order to weed out corrupt politicians and public officials. Unfortunately, there will always be shady individuals who seek a place in government office, but the aforementioned safeguards will enhance the general public's ability to separate the genuine candidates from those who are self-serving, dishonest or corrupt.
No comments:
Post a Comment