Examination result oriented teaching is in essence a notion whereby the instructor understands the examination contents quite well and takes the class with the coursework, all the whilst maintaining his/her attention to the idea the only purpose is always to allow the individual to acquire high grades at the examination itself , irregardless of the curriculum contents.
Even though there exists no arguing that this teaching method achieves the purpose of making certain the considerable majority of students will score very well in the examinations, one have to ask yet again - is this the proper method to educate our little children?
In reality, the system that comes with an examination outcome oriented strategy of teaching is creating a unrealistic condition of "easy testing." This can cause a pupil who transfers from this academic institution and into one where a far more traditional approach is practiced to flunk miserably because there exists no longer an exceptionally clear and concise knowing of exactly what to expect when it comes time for tests.
Likewise, when a student graduates right from high school and gets into university, if they happen to attend a university, or possibly a course, where by exam result oriented teaching is not really the normal practice, they're going to find it invariably a lot more challenging to be successful in that testing environment. Nonetheless, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, pupils can engage in ways to perform well in exams.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
However, it is also entirely possible that the self-confidence that was instilled by a relatively "effortless" education approach helps to give a young adult the confidence to be successful in more demanding predicaments. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel confident they can handle it with grace and peace of mind, simply because - after all - they have constantly been in a position to do so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
Even though there exists no arguing that this teaching method achieves the purpose of making certain the considerable majority of students will score very well in the examinations, one have to ask yet again - is this the proper method to educate our little children?
In reality, the system that comes with an examination outcome oriented strategy of teaching is creating a unrealistic condition of "easy testing." This can cause a pupil who transfers from this academic institution and into one where a far more traditional approach is practiced to flunk miserably because there exists no longer an exceptionally clear and concise knowing of exactly what to expect when it comes time for tests.
Likewise, when a student graduates right from high school and gets into university, if they happen to attend a university, or possibly a course, where by exam result oriented teaching is not really the normal practice, they're going to find it invariably a lot more challenging to be successful in that testing environment. Nonetheless, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, pupils can engage in ways to perform well in exams.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
However, it is also entirely possible that the self-confidence that was instilled by a relatively "effortless" education approach helps to give a young adult the confidence to be successful in more demanding predicaments. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel confident they can handle it with grace and peace of mind, simply because - after all - they have constantly been in a position to do so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out to the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, nonetheless it is clear that we are teaching our youngsters a lesson - regardless of whether it's a positive lesson or perhaps a damaging lesson might not yet still be crystal clear.
About the Author:
Jane has been an educator for the last 5 years in Singapore, an exams result oriented country. she writes often in her blog on taking exams such as O levels and other exams in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment